Thursday, August 23, 2012

Letter from Civil Service aspirants to Media on possible discrimination in Prelims


Dear All,

A copy of the letter received from Civil Service aspirants, addressed to Media on possible discrimination in Prelims is herewith enclosed for academic debate and comments..For any clarification/information/help please contact the persons mentioned below...Let us wish for a more transparent system of recruitment...

To,
Media

Sir / Madam,
We, the civil service aspirants, are the victims of THE UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION with its opaque and biased system of recruitment.
 We would like to bring two major issues to your notice.
1. Undue advantage to aspirants with Hindi as mother tongue at the cost of Non-Hindi aspirants especially with rural back drop which invalidates fair competition, equity, representativeness, merit.
2. Mistakes in the key for Civil services preliminary examination, 2011 provided by UPSC via RTI. 

Issue 1: UPSC provides civil services Preliminary paper in two languages, English and Hindi. With its changed preliminary pattern from 2011, Hindi speaking students are getting undue advantage. 
Earlier pattern up to 2010 used to have Paper I (Optional) and Paper II (General Studies). Even in that pattern Hindi speaking students used to have some advantage. But one requires having prior knowledge in selected optional subjects (public administration, geography, psychology, etc) and GS (History, Geography, Economics, General Science, etc) to answer questions. 
This year (2012 prelims like last year) question paper has given much more advantage to Hindi speaking students violating Right to Equality of opportunity in matters of public employment(Article16) which can be observed in paper II with question numbers 1-15, 28-38, 51-56 (please refer to enclosed 2012 paper II question paper) i.e. in total 32 questions with weightage of 80 marks (32*2.5 mark) need not require any prior knowledge to answer as they were just reading comprehension questions and only Hindi translation is given to these questions which made things easier to Hindi belt aspirants than Non-Hindi aspirants as comprehending things is easy in one's mother tongue.
There are two kinds of comprehensive questions in paper II:
1. Comprehension (given in English and Hindi)
2. English language comprehensive skills (given only in English)

If one observes the trend of last two years papers the difficulty level of comprehension questions (serial numbers 1-15, 28-38, 51-56) is high compared to English language comprehensive skills questions (serial numbers 66-73). By this Non-Hindi aspirants are forced to answer difficult comprehension questions in English, where as Hindi aspirants have the option of answering them in Hindi. Since, English language comprehensive skills questions (given only in English) are easier, Hindi students didn't feel much difficulty to answer. By this UPSC is expecting too much English language skills from Non-Hindi aspirants and too little from Hindi medium students defeating the principles of Equity, Justice, Fair Play, MERIT and the purpose for which English comprehension was introduced.
In this kind of examination with huge competition, each and every mark makes huge difference. Clear cut advantage of 80 odd marks for Hindi belt aspirants left only few non-Hindi students to see success. This year many aspirants (many of them were successful in their earlier attempts) from Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, Odissa, West Bengal, North East states, etc are not able to clear preliminary exam. As per our sample size many aspirants based in Hyderabad who performed well in exam failed to clear and few of them have exhausted their attempts. 
Moreover rural back ground aspirants (with non-Hindi mother tongue) failed miserably to score well. Also, there are many inference based reasoning questions and it is the same case with these questions too. 
Issue 2:  UPSC is releasing the Prelims key through RTI only after the completion of final selections provides no benefit to anybody either for the Candidates or for the UPSC as UPSC cannot rectify its mistakes retrospectively. 

For example for question number 11 in Paper-1 of Preliminary exam-2011, the answer was given by UPSC was D (please refer to enclosed 2011 paper I question paper and answer key by UPSC as  response to RTI application) where as the correct answer was option C (Source to prove answer given by UPSC was wrong is http://indiacode.nic.in/coiweb/amend/amend74.htm Article 243ZD). This question alone might have affected result of examination as it might have denied the opportunity to write mains for deserved as he/she might have awarded -0.66 marks instead of +2 marks, i.e. it might have reflected difference of 2.66 marks

But the UPSC has been declining the RTI request for the Answer KEY immediately after the preliminary exam saying "the exam process is not yet complete and section 8(1)(j) is invoked".

Unlike the essay type Mains exam which may have some subjective bias, Prelims is purely objective type exam with only one answer choice, so KEY must be OBJECTIVE without any confusion. Hence Answer choices must be unambiguous established facts. Hence there should not be any harm to the exam process if the key was released immediately after the prelims exam.

Through this mail we request you to consider these issues on war footing scale as the Mains exam is fast approaching from October 5, 2012.


1. Raise issue in parliament as grave injustice of this kind may cause huge damage to non-Hindi students, so UPSC should be forced to suspend 2012 preliminary and should re conduct exam after correcting flaws.
2. Highlight the injustice, discriminatory nature of UPSC for violating basic Fundamental Rights (Article 16 of Indian constitution – Equality of opportunity) which in turn invalidates exam itself.
3. Please share the information with your peer media houses as all non-Hindi students affected.


Please give us an active voice at different forums like Parliament, Media, other eminent groups and contacts of you.


Along with this mail we are enclosing following documents.
1. UPSC Civil Services Preliminary question paper 2 of year 2012 (Civil services prelims 2012 question paper - Paper II - Set A.pdf)
2. UPSC Civil Services Preliminary question paper 1 of 2011 (Civil services prelims 2011 question paper - Paper I - Set A.pdf)
3. Answer key for 2011 paper1 provided by UPSC in response to RTI application (Answer key to 2011 paper I set A.jpeg)
4. RTI reply by UPSC with the file name: UPSC_RTI_rejection_2012_point3_mrunal.gif

We like to declare that all the information provided in this mail is true as per our knowledge.

Yours faithfully

Ram Sudhir K, 08142111315 <ramsudhir.kunchey@gmail.com>
Ramana Akula, 09908815644 < akula.ramana@gmail.com>
                                 Ravindra Reddy G, 0¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬-9491550232<ravindra.civils@gmail.com>
A Madhusudhan Reddy  <amreddy25@gmail.com
Mallikarjuna Rao Para , 09160161016  <rao.para@gmail.com>

Following is the list of few candidates who are also with us in the true letter and spirit.

NAME <e-mail ID> <Place> (Civil services preliminary 2012 hall ticket number) 
Ramana Akula <akula.ramana@gmail.com> Markapur, Prakasam Dist (220709),
Ravindra Reddy <ravindra.civils@gmail.com> Tadepalli, Guntur Dist(001941), 
Mallikarjuna Para <rao.para@gmail.com>  Ananthavaram, Guntur Dist (004503),
ramsudhir kunchey <ramsudhir.kunchey@gmail.com>, Hyderabad
Yogesh Thandava <Yogesh_Thandava@yahoo.co.in> Giddaluru, Prakasam Dist (002103),
Murali Nalam <Murali.nalam@gmail.com>  (002770),
Ramesh Chava <ch.ramesh896@gmail.com>  (006561), 
Rakesh C <rakeysh123@gmail.com>  Hyderabad (161409),
Narendra <narencse85@gmail.com>  Kanigiri, Prakasam Dist (061012),
Rakesh Reddy <rakeshreddyb4u@gmail.com>, Tirupati
Uday Kumar <udayrai@gmail.com>  Bhadrachalam, Khammam Dist(003025),
Bhaskar Reddy, Warangal,
Dr Ravinder Reddy, <drkarnambbs@yahoo.com>  kanigiri, prakasam Dist, (100287)
Dr Sunil, Warangal,
polireddy palagiri <polireddy.p@gmail.com>,  YSR Kadapa
G Nishita, 058437, Khammam Dist
P.Jhansi, 147874
Sridhar Gayam <sridhar.gayam@gmail.com>, kanigiri, prakasam Dist 
Venu Kesam <venu.kesam@gmail.com>, Vijayawada
Venkata Niyanth < venkatniyanth@gmail.com>, Rajamundry, 
Narasimha Prasad , Nellore, 
Ravi Patro, Srikakulam, 
Chiranjeevi G Vidyasagar <sagar_withu@yahoo.com>, 
ChandraKanth <chandrakanth1038@gmail.com>, 
Siva Prasad <Siva.965@gmail.com

Durfar Conflict & South Sudan Independence


Mrunal's New article on UPSC: "[Diplomacy] Durfar Conflict & South Sudan Independence: Timeline, Players, Similarities and differences" plus 3 more

Posted: 21 Aug 2012 07:24 AM PDT
Donot confuse or mixup between Durfar and South Sudan. These are two separate conflicts with separate climaxes.
  1. What is Sudan?
  2. Background: Durfur and South Sudan
  3. Reasons for Conflict
  4. Players in Durfur conflict
  5. Players in South Sudan Independence Struggle
  6. Arrest Warrent against Omar Al Bashir
  7. Climax
  8. North Vs South Sudan
  9. India's response

What

Posted: 21 Aug 2012 06:55 AM PDT

What is Senkaku/Diaoyu islands:

Eight uninhabited islands and rocks in question lie in the East China Sea. They have a total area of about 7 sq km and lie northeast of Taiwan These group of islands are known as the Senkaku islands in Japan and the Diaoyu islands in China. Both

Posted: 21 Aug 2012 06:53 AM PDT
  1. Member States
  2. Should India become a full time member of SCO?
  3. Arguments against joining SCO
  4. Arguments in favor of joining SCO

Introduction: What is SCO?

Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Intergovernmental organization, consisting of certain of Central  Asian countries. Founded in 2001 in Shanghai.

What does SCO do?


Posted: 21 Aug 2012 06:50 AM PDT
This is a Guest article by Manikandan Soundararajan
  1. What is Cloud Computing?
  2. Definition of Cloud Computing
  3. Pros and Cons of Cloud Computing

What is Cloud Computing?

Situation 1

I am looking for a house. My first constraint, being a middle class man, obviously is money. The House owner here is ready to

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Blind Indore girl cleared UPSC, gets railways job at PM’s behest

A visually challenged woman who cleared the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) with distinction in 2008 but was denied posting got justice after a four-year battle and the intervention of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. Purnima Jain, with about 75% visual disability, has been offered an Indian Railway Personnel Services (IRPS) posting under Group B of Class I.

Although Purnima is willing to take up the new job, she isn't satisfied with the posting as she says that her scores in the exams were level with those selected for IAS. "It's a sort of double marginalisation: as a woman and then being physically challenged," Purnima told ToI.

She cleared the UPSC 2008 exams with 1,123 marks and hoped to get into the IAS or IFS. But that was not to be as she was visually challenged. The person selected in the '08 batch had got only 991 marks," said Purnima, adding, "I got 210 marks out of 300 in the interview, which was equal to that year's topper."

When her order wasn't issued, she moved the MP high court in which UPSC and DoPT raised "questions of maintainability", stating that the court had no jurisdiction on such cases and asked her to approach Central Administrative Tribune (CAT), which he did.

"I approached CAT and finally the decision was in my favour," said Purnima. But despite that, the government was not keen on implementing it. So, she approached Union minister V Narayanswami who assured her of action in two or three weeks.

"Following his intervention, UPSC recommended my name. Even then, the DoPT did not give me the offer letter. I then approached the Prime Minister with the help of CPM MP Brinda Karat. He assured me justice," said Purnima. Soon, she got a letter from DoPT offering her a job in Indian Railways Personnel Service (IRPS) which she is going to take up next week. "I deserve more than what I am getting. But I am happy that I finally secured the position," Purnima told ToI.

Daughter of Dr Prakash Jain, Purnima completed her BA, LLB jointly in which she scored nearly 80%. She then completed her masters in public administration in 2008 and qualified NET/JRF in 2009.

source : http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-03-12/indore/31152157_1_upsc-dopt-union-public-service-commission

PM-thoughts-on-baseless-allegations


WHEN UPA-II came to power in May 2009, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh asked his officers to think creatively and become the "believers in equity, innovation and public accountability at work". But over the last one and half years, the tone and content of PM's speeches changed, as those are now more of a reassurance to civil servants and political functionaries that the government won't allow any witch-hunt to prevail upon. On Independence Day, the PM…
reassured public functionaries that they would be protected against "baseless allegations and unnecessary litigation". Singh who himself was a bureaucrat in commerce and finance ministry for two decades before assuming charge as FM in 1991, is now facing the silent challenge from the bureaucracy which is refusing to take big decisions in fear of future allegations. This is what is PM's assurance at Red Fort: "We will continue our efforts to bring more transparency and accountability in the work of public servants and to reduce corruption. But we will also take care that these measures do not result in a situation in which the morale of public functionaries taking decisions in public interest gets affected because of baseless allegations and unnecessary litigation," PM said while delivering the Independence Day speech.
It's however not the first time PM has highlighted the concerns of honest civil servants and other public functionaries who are often bracketed along with the corrupt machinery. The bureaucracy has been at the receiving end from the time the debate on anti-corruption ombudsman Lokpal began. Many honest officers have intentionally lied low and refused to take major decisions as they thought that might haunt them at a later stage. While taking part in the Lokpal debate in Lok Sabha in December, 2011, PM had an interesting observation. He said: "I don't think all public functionaries need to be painted with the same brush…While I agree that public functionaries must be above board and that delinquents must be dealt with expeditiously and decisively, I must express my deep appreciation for many a public servant who have shown exemplary integrity in discharging their functions in an environment of distrust."
PM's yet another comment during that Parliament debate was significant. "Very often our public servants have to take decisions under conditions of uncertainty. The future being inherently uncertain, it is possible that an action which ex ante appears to be rational may ex post turn out to be faulty. Our systems of reward and punishment must not lose sight of this fact."

In fact, if you study the speeches that PM has delivered during the last one and half years, he has been repeating the same point on bureaucracy mainly to allay fear among officials and ministers. And that is a major departure from the time he came to power second time in May 2009. When UPA-II government was formed, the question of any policy paralysis did not arise. What did Singh tell his bureaucrats then? In the first meeting with PMO officials in June 2009, Singh appealed his officers to "think creatively", and stressed the need to be "believers in equity, innovation and public accountability at work".
 

Constitutional amendment for reservation in promotion


THE government may bring in a new bill in Parliament, preferably during this current session, which will validate quota in promotion of government jobs in the backdrop of Supreme Court striking down such reservation in a case in Uttar Pradesh recently. In this highly political proposition, all parties except Samajwadi Party and National Conference, have given their nod. But this political move is creating a fear psychosis in government offices as it may divide the work-force on a caste line, and it is argued that deserving general caste officers may lag behind. BoI here presents 10 facts including earlier Supreme Court judgements as curated from observations made in Tuesday's all-party meet on the subject:
• Supreme Court in the case of UP Power Corporation Ltd Vs Rajesh Kumar & Others struck down provision of reservation in promotion to SCs and STs in UP
• Supreme Court in its judgment on Indra Sawhney case dated November 16, 1992 held that reservation in promotion is ultra vires but allowed its continuation for five years from the date of judgment as a "special case".
• The 77th amendment to the Constitution (1995) inserted clause (4A) to Article 16 to continue reservation for SCs and STs in promotion.
• Clause (4A) of the Constitution was modified through 85th amendment to give benefit of consequential seniority to SC/ST candidates promoted by reservation.
• Government often launches Special Recruitment Drives to fill up backlog vacancies reserved for SCs, STs and OBCs. In 2004, more than 60,000 backlog reserved vacancies were filled up. The Special Recruitment Drive, 2008 resulted in filling up of 43,781 vacancies.
• By 82nd amendment to the Constitution, a proviso was incorporated in Article 335 of the Constitution which enabled the state to give relaxations or concessions to the SC and ST candidates in the matter of promotion.
• During the recent past the Supreme Court has struck down reservation in promotion in some states.
• Samajwadi Party and National Conference have opposed the government's move to bring in Constitutional amendment for reservation in promotion of government servants.
• The government may bring in a bill in current session of Parliament itself.
• It remains to be seen how Supreme Court reacts to such a political overture.
 


No country for the young

Why don't India's political parties have a story for the young and the aspiring?

When Mahatma Gandhi launched the non-cooperation movement in 1920, Jinnah mockingly told him that it would only appeal to the young, ignorant and the illiterate. Jinnah was right: satyagraha was the turning point for the freedom movement because it created a message that spread to deeper levels of the Indian society. The British empire survived for 200 years only because it was a joint venture with disparate Indians groups; Gandhi destroyed this joint venture by unifying many of these groups with a horizontal narrative that trumped their vertical divisions. His genius was in recognising that politics is a battle for hearts and minds. Gandhi did not seek consensus but moulded it. As India approaches parliamentary elections in 2014, there seems to be a curious acceptance that they will result in a hung parliament. There is also a curious lack of narrative from any political party for the young and the aspiring. Could these two tragedies be related?

The absence of a compelling narrative or vision in contemporary politics has many alibis. The secular card does not work because India is much more secular than it was — the Khans in contemporary Bollywood, Aamir, Salman, Saif and Shah Rukh, are hardly more talented than Madhubala, Nargis, Dilip Kumar and Meena Kumari, but they don't have to change their names to mask their religion.

And we haven't had Hindu-Muslim riots since 2002. The garibi hatao card does not work because voters are jaded by the lack of execution of promises since that slogan was coined 40 years ago. The free electricity card does not work because it leads to no power, which infuriates the people further. The reservation card does not work because we have reached the limits of confiscating capacity in hiring, education and promotions. The big state that is financed with deficits is discredited because the economic mayhem of the past few years shows that there is no magical "multiplier effect", and deficit financing leads to inflation with no boost in output. The freebies card is less effective because it has to be given to everybody, since fixing the plumbing to target its distribution is so difficult to achieve. The majboori card is less potent because of prosperity; it is much harder to get people to migrate to big cities than it should be. The foreign enemy card does not work because Pakistan is imploding and we are hardly surrounded, like Israel is. The mystique of the incumbent does not work because the 24-hour news cycle encourages breathless breaking news over reflection. The "young blood" card does not work because the only pathways in politics are geriatric. The corruption card does not work because, um, if everybody lives in glass houses, everybody needs to answer the bell.

Political parties are confused because the old is dying and the new has not been born. In other words, is the hope, which Nandan Nilekani voiced in his book Imagining India, of "horizontal aspirations overwhelming our vertical divisions" finally starting to play itself out? The traditional lightning rods of religion, caste and poverty do not inspire the same level of indignation, outrage or action that they did because of India's youth. Younger people have more in front of them than behind them. They are not focused on preservation but creation because their dreams are more powerful than their memory. But Indian policymaking is currently hostage to old people positioning their self-interest as national interest: land mafia, education entrepreneurs, road contractors, small retailers, trade unions, state electricity employees and secretaries angling for post-retirement appointments, politicians whose only competence is manipulation, and crony capitalists.

Confronting these blood clots requires courage and imagination. This is politically impossible in an ageing country like Japan where deflation and a strong yen — it recently reached the highest level since World War II — is murdering Japan's exports and hurting young people. But the government is not responding because a high yen benefits Japan's elderly residents and retirees by accelerating the flow of less expensive imported products into the country, which lets retirees stretch their savings. Professor Yutaka Harada at Tokyo's Waseda University recently told The New York Times, "Japan's tolerance of the strong yen and deflation is rooted in a clash of generations and for now, the seniors are winning". Seniors winning over the young is understandable in Japan, but not in India, where 65 per cent of the population is less than 35 years old.

India's young care most about jobs. And a narrative that places job creation at the heart of policy synthesises the most important issues: roads, power, labour laws, land reform, education, skills and deregulation. Executing on this narrative will also leave beneficiaries of the current status quo less entrenched.

Many politicians say they believe in reform but don't know how to get re-elected once they do it. Job creation offers them a simple narrative for the young at the intersection of good politics and good economics.

A recent survey suggests that both the Congress-led UPA and the BJP-led NDA will get an anaemic 120-130 seats in 2014. Whatever the numbers, it is highly probable that India is in for a rerun of the painful movie we saw in the late 1990s, when it was raining prime ministers. But 18 months is a long time in politics. In the US, Mitt Romney represented a non-ideological pragmatism that appealed to nobody till his selection of the running mate made the November election a sharper choice between different narratives. Of course, India needs a generational change; the wisdom in physicist Max Planck's quip that science progresses "one funeral at a time" applies to Indian politics.

But Gandhiji's takeover of the Congress after his return from South Africa demonstrated what is possible with a strong narrative even without generational change. The only thing worse than being wrong in life is being confused. Political parties that choose the young and jobs will neither be wrong nor confused. Any takers?
 
 

Monday, August 20, 2012

Letter highlighting UPSC’s attitude and conduct with respect to transparency and accountability

A LETTER TO CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA


Please find a Letter highlighting UPSC's attitude and conduct with respect to transparency and accountability(Read RTI Act) & legal issues involved there with ,including value of  SC case-laws. You may find the full text from below link and offer your comments on it.

http://tsanewindia.blogspot.in/2012/08/a-letter-to-chief-justice-of-india-dear.html?spref=tw

9 types of Questions in Civil Service Mains Exam

Question is instructing you toWhat should you do?
Discuss Give both the positive and negative points(prelution and conclusion are must)
Describefocuss should be only on that particular subject matter(for ex: e-governance only)(prelution is must but conclusion is your optional)
Explain the answer should be based on answering in detail Why, How, for what, of that subject of the question.ie., we have to give all the important points.(prelution and conclusion are must)
Distinguish answer should be based on How the suject of question differs from otherthings.(only prelution is must)
Differentiatethere should be detailed comparision and distinguishing(as said above) the subject of question with others.(only prelution is must)
Examine the answer should consist of the how good, what disadvantages, what impact of the subject of question.
Enumerate first list out the all the relevant points, then explain one by one.(prelution and conclusion are must)
ReasonFind out what is the correct reason for the subject and explain one by one without side heading but highlighting the point with dots or numbers.(only prelution)
Analyse try to give your view with future impact and goods and bads.(both prelution and conclusion are must)

Break the Question in 3 parts

First step is break the question into its configuration parts.
For example, consider this question asked in General Studies (Mains) exam of 2004
"Discuss the e-governance in Indian context"
Let's start the process of breaking this question.

  1. Focus on  topic on e-governance (subject of question)
  2. How to do in the cotext of india(base of question)
  3. What to do  dicussing the positive and negative points of view(tool of question)

7 steps answer writing

  1. Find out the conclusive theme, when you read the question at first.
  2. Write shortly what is meant by e-governance(should be ideal/neutral)
  3. Directly go to the discussion neutrally.
  4. Try to begin with the positive points
  5. Give a negative point only after a positive point. This shows you to the evaluator that you are on the correct way of the answering the question and understood the question perfectly.
  6. Carefully keep the word limit
  7. At the end, give a finishing touch with the positive points. Why because, the evaluator provide marks only at the end of the answer, if you do so, it will make a good impression in the minds of the evaluator. Then we will get more and plus marks.
  8. Draw a conclusion in accordance with your answer. Do not give your suggestion but give the existing fact with currant context of India. Worth noting when handling a question(what you are asked to do)

Sunday, August 19, 2012

Yojana and Kurukshetra: How to use them for UPSC preparation without wasting time?

Question from a reader
I use to read articles of Hindu, economic times daily and cover articles of yojna,kurukshetra within a month.How to prioritize this as they take much time and eats up time of the subjects.
Answer
  • You don't have to read Yojana or Kurukshetra line by line.
  • They've information on a few schemes, some suggestion for Development, [overrated] success stories of SHG and NGOs.
  • The exam oriented information in each month's issue, can be summerized in a note in barely 2 pages or even less, depending on your notes-making skill. [Most of the names,dates,numbers and data-tables given in the magazine, are useless from exam point of view.]
  • So, just scan through the pages, note down any useful fodder related to schemes and Development [which you can use in descriptive answers or essay] and then throw away the magazine in the store-room [or delete the pdf file from the harddisk].
  • This exercise should take less than two hours and two A4 sized pages, each month for each magazine of Yojana and Kurukshetra.

Regarding How to read newspapers,- read this article
http://mrunal.org/2012/06/current-affairs-ias.html

Walk-in Facility for Passport

The Ministry of External Affairs issued an advisory in June, 2012 to all Regional Passport Offices in the country to introduce walk in facility to ease availability of on line appointment and facilitate easy submission of forms for passport applications under following categories:

• Applicants for Tatkaal services (fresh / re-issue cases);
• Applicants for issue of Police Clearance Certificate (PCC);
• Applicants for deletion of ECR status in passports without any change in personal particulars;
• Applicants for inclusion of name of the spouse in passport;
• Applicants with valid passports, seeking new booklets in case of exhaustion of visa pages;
• Senior Citizens (above 60 years);
• Minor below 15 years whose parents hold valid passports;
• Physically challenged persons; and
• Central / State Government servants, their spouses and dependent minor children who have 'No Objection Certificate' / Identity Certificate.

The Ministry of External Affairs has recently introduced walk in facility to ease online appointments and smoothen submission of applications at the six Passport Seva Kendras (PSKs) under RegionalPassport Office, Hyderabad from these above mentioned categories of applicants w.e.f. August 01, 2012.

The Minister of State in the Ministry Of External Affairs Smt. Preneet Kaur provided this information in reply to a question in Lok Sabha.

Source: Press Information Bureau

Castes under proposal for inclusion in SC/ST Category

State-wise details of proposals presently under process with the Central Government, for inclusion of specific castes/tribes etc. in the list of (i) Scheduled Castes, (ii) Scheduled Tribes

 

(i)  Scheduled Castes

Sl. No.

State

Caste

1.

Bihar 1. *Tanti (Tatwa)
2. *Kanu
3. *Prajapati ( Kumhar)
4. *Badhai

2.

Chhattisgarh5. Mahra,  Mahara
6. Chik Ganda, Chik, Cheek
7. *Audhelia, Adholia, Adhoria, Adhoulia

3.

Haryana8. Kabirpanthi Julaha

4.

Karnataka9. Bovi (Non-Besta), Kallu Waddar, Mannu Waddar

5.

Kerala10. Madiga
11. Koppalan
12.Peruvannan

6.

Madhya Pradesh 13.Sakhwar

7.

Odisha 14.Chik, Chik Badaik
15.Tiar, Tior
16.Situria
17.Jayantara Pano, Jena Pano
18.Poundra, Pod, etc (Bengali refugee)
19.Khadal, Khodal,
20.Gaudia Kela
21.Adhuria Domb, Adhuria Dom
22.Rajak, Rajaka
23.Betra
24.Khatia
25.Agheri Kela, Sinduria Kela
26.Goudia Kela
27.Pana Baishnab, Pano Baishnab
28.Kalandi, Kalandi Baishnab, Kalindi Baishnab
29.Kandra Baishnab, Kandara Baishnab
30.Bauri Baishnab
31.Dhoba Baishnab
32.Gokha Baishnab, Gokah Baishnab
33.Kesuria
34.Bhina, Tula Bhina
35.Mehantar, Mehentar
36.Sitra

8.

Uttarakhand37.*Namasudra, Pod, Poundra

(ii)    Scheduled Tribes

Sl.No.State Tribe
12 3
1.Andhra Pradesh 1.Mandula
2. Konda Kummari
2. Assam3.Karbis and Dimasas of Plain District
4.Halam
5.Tamang
6.Phakes (Phakeals), Khamyang, Turung & Aiton under Man (Tai) Speaking Tribes.
7.Adivasi (Tea Tribes), Ahom, Matak, Maran & Chutia.
8.Amri Karbi
9.Change of Nomenclature of "Miri" to "Mising" & inclusion of "Thengal Kachari"
10.Sarania Kachari
11.Bodo Kachari
3.Bihar 12.Kamkar within bracket with Kharwar
 13.Gour, Gonr
14.Bakho
15.Krishi Vaishya, Chasot, as synonyms  of Kisan
4.Chhattisgarh 16.Abujh Maria & Hill Korwa
17.Sanwara, Saunra as synonyms of Sawar, Sawara
18.Pathari as synoym of Pardhan(entry no.  35)
19.Saura, Sahara , Soura & Saonra as synonyms of Sawar, Sawara (entry 41)
20.Saora/Sanvra & Banjara communities
Saura-Sanwara
Saunra-Sanwara
21.Panika
22.Mahra
23.Bhuiya etc    as synonyms of "Bharia Bhumia",
24. Nekah Halba/Telanga as synonym of Halba Halbi(entry 17)
Ganda as a synonym of Gadba(entry 15)
25.Dhanuhar, Dhanuwar  as a synonym of Dhanwar(entry no. 14)
26.Rautia
27.Binjhia
28.Sabria
29.Rautia, Mowar, Banjara, Rajwar
5.Himachal Pradesh 30.Barad, Bangala, Hatti(Giripar), Dudra-Kwaru
31.Hatti(people of Trans-Giri area)
6.Jammu & Kashmir 32.Argons community(Ladakh Region)
33.Chopan
34.Pahari speaking people
35.Koli as synonym of Sippi
7.Jharkhand 36.Khangar, Biar, Kolh (Teli), Khetauri & Kurmi/ Kudumi (Mahato) and Ghatwar
37.Puran
38.Tamaria (Tamadia)
39.Rautia
40.Mundari
8.Karnataka 42.Gangamatha   (39 synonymous)
43.Gonda (Gowda) (Helava/Yenadi/ Pichaguntalu and Gauwali
44.Halakki Vokkalu
45.Talwara and Pariwara as synonym of Naikda
9.Kerala 46.Re-inclusion of Marati (in Hosdrug and Kasargod Taluk of Cannanore District)
47.Pathiyan
48.Vetan and Nayadi
10.Madhya Pradesh 49.Re-inclusion of  Keer, Mina and Pardhi
50.Dheemar, Kevat, Kahar, Bhoi, Mallah and Nishad as synonym of Majhi and Majhwar in the ST of M.P.
11.Maharashtra 51.Injhwar as synonym of Binjhwar
52.Dhobi, Parit, Warthi, Rajak communities as synonym of Dhoba ST of Maharashtra .
12.Odisha 53.Amanatia
54.Bhattada
55.Bhottar
56.Bodo Bhottada
57.Banda Paraja
58.Bonda Paraja
59.Beldar Gond
60.Budu Kondh
61.Budha Kondh
62.Buri Kondh
63.Buda Kandha
64.Buri Kandha
65.Budha Kandha
66.Boda Savara
67.Boda Savar
68.Bhima
69.Babhili Saora
70.Bhukta
71.Bhogta
72.Bhokta
73.Bhagta
74.Bhagata
75.Bhaghata
76.Bhuinya
77.Bhumija
78.Boj Gadaba
79.Bareng Jhodia Paroja
80.Cheronga Kolha
81.Chapua Kamar
82.Dhurava
83.Dhurua
84.Desia Kondh
85.Dongria Kondh
86.Desua Kandha
87.Desi Kandha
88.Dudu Kandha
89.Danguria Kandha
90.Dongria Kandha
91.Desua Kondh
92.Didaya
93.Dudha Kharia
94.Dalki Kharia
95.Dhangara
96.Eranga Munda
97.Eranga Kolha
98.Gampa Koya
99.Gumpa Koya
100.Gontar Saora
101.Jadu Savar
102.Jurei Savar
103.Jathi Saora
104.Joda Saora
105.Jodu Saora
106.Jathi Savar
107.Jodia Kandh
108.Kaur
109.Kumar
110.Kutia Kondh
111.Kandh Gauda
112.Kandh Paroja
113.Kuttia Kandha
114.Khondh Paroja
115.Kapu Saora
116.Kindal Savar
117.Kampa Seura
118.Kampo Saora
119.Kumbi Saora
120.Kurumba Saora
121.Kanohar Saora
122.Kuduba Sora
123.Kampa Saora
124.Kolha Lohara
125.Khandayat Bhuinya
126.Koara
127.Koitor
128.Kalanga
129.Kadar Kalanga
130.Kandhia
131.Konda Paroja
132.Kol Kamar
133.Luhura
134.Lohara
135.Laban
136.Labana
137.Lahara
138.Loar
139.Luhar
140.Lodha Khadia
141.Meria Gond
142.Malua Kandha
143.Muli Kandha
144.Mano Savar
145.Mutha Savar
146..Mutha Saora
147.Mana Saora
148.Mussara Koya
149.Mallah Saora
150.Malla Savar
151.Mankidia
152.Nageswar
153.Nagabansimunda
154.Ollera Gadaba
155.Oriya Saora
156.Oriya Kandha
157.Penga Paroja
158.Pengu Paroja
159.Porja
160.Parjia
161.Paroja Bhuyan
162.Pauri Bhyan
163.Paudi Bhuyan
164.Paik Bhuyan
165.Paidi Bhuyan
166.Paraja Bhuyan
167.Praja Bhuyan
168.Puran
169.Pahadi Kharia
170.Pengu Kandha
171.Patra Savara
172.Paba
173.Rajkuli Bhuyan
174.Rautali Bhuyan
175.Rajkoli Bhuyan
176.Rajodi Bhuyan
178.Raja Kandha
179.Routia
180.Sudho Soura
181.Suna Saora
182.Sudha Savar
183.Sudha Saora
184.Sano Bhottada
185. Sana Gadaba
186.Satara Kharia
187.Selia Paroja
188.Singalal Bhumiha
189.Saara
190.Sara
191.Tankala Savar
192.Tankla Saora
193.Tamodia Bhumija
194.Tamudia Bhumija
195.Tamandia Bhumij
196.Tamaria
197.Tamulia Bhumija
198.Tamadia Bhumij
199.Tali Bhumija
200.Tikiria Kandha
201.Tikri Kondh
202.Uram
203.Durua
204.Nakasia/Naxia
205.Kandha Kumbhar
206.Tanla Gauda
207.Jhodia
208.Oram/Uraon
209.Anati Dora/Enati Dora
210.Muria
211.Paika Bhuyan/Paik Bhuyan
212.Paharia (Kamar)
213. Oran Mudi (Mudi)
214.Sualgiri/Swalgiri (Shabar)
215.Mani Dora/Mana Dora/Mane Dora
216.Paraja Bhuyan
217.Konda Reddy/Konda Reddi
218.Bhil
219.Puran/Bhanja  Puran/ Tamdia  Puran/ Tamudia Puran/ Tamuria Puran/ Tamaria  Puran
220.Inclusion of "Kui Kandha" Instead of "Kui"